
The study, published yesterday in the journal Nature, is the first time
that scientists have managed to produce a genetically modified microbe
that is able to function and replicate with a different genetic code to
the one that is thought to have existed ever since life first started to
evolve on Earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
The semi-synthetic microbe, a genetically modified Escherichia coli
bacterium, has been endowed with an extra artificial piece of genetic
material, deoxy ribo-Nucleic Acid (DNA), with an expanded genetic
alphabet – instead of the usual four “letters” of the alphabet its DNA
molecule has six.
Each strand of the DNA’s double helix has a backbone of sugar
molecules and, attached to it, chemical subunits known as bases. There
are four different bases: adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C) and
guanine (G). These letters represent the code for the amino-acid
building blocks that make up proteins. The bases bind the two DNA
strands together, with an A always bonding to a T on the opposite strand
(and vice versa), and C and G doing likewise.
The DNA of the new semi-synthetic microbe, however, has a pair of
extra base pairs, denoted by X and Y, which pair up together like the
other base pairs and are fully integrated into the rest of the DNA’s
genetic code.
The scientists said that the semi-synthetic E. coli bacterium
replicates normally and is able to pass on the new genetic information
to subsequent generations. However, it was not able to use the new
encoded information to produce any novel proteins – the synthetic DNA
was added as an extra circular strand that did not take part in the
bacterium’s normal metabolic functions.
A chemical biologist at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla,
California, United States, who led the 15-year effort, Prof. Floyd
Romesberg, said: “What we have now is a living cell that literally
stores increased genetic information.”
Scientists
first questioned whether life could store information using other
chemical groups in the 1960s. But it wasn’t until 1989 that Steven
Benner, then at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, and
his team coaxed modified forms of cytosine and guanine into DNA
molecules. In test-tube reactions, strands made of these “funny
letters”, as Benner calls them, copied themselves and encoded RNA and
proteins.
The bases engineered by Romesberg’s team are more alien, bearing
little chemical resemblance to the four natural ones, Benner says. In a
2008 paper, and in follow-up experiments, the group reported efforts to
pair chemicals together from a list of 60 candidates and screen the
3,600 resulting combinations. They identified a pair of bases, known as
d5SICS and dNaM, that looked promising. In particular, the molecules had
to be compatible with the enzymatic machinery that copies and
translates DNA.
“We didn’t even think back then that we could move into an organism
with this base pair,” says Denis Malyshev, a former graduate student in
Romesberg’s lab who is first author of the new paper. Working with
test-tube reactions, the scientists succeeded in getting their unnatural
base pair to copy itself and be transcribed into RNA, which required
the bases to be recognized by enzymes that had evolved to use A, T, C
and G.
The first challenge to creating this alien life was to get cells to
accept the foreign bases needed to maintain the molecule in DNA through
repeated rounds of cell division, during which DNA is copied. The team
engineered the bacterium Escherichia coli to express a gene from a
diatom — a single-celled alga — encoding a protein that allowed the
molecules to pass through the bacterium’s membrane.
The scientists then created a short loop of DNA, called a plasmid,
containing a single pair of the foreign bases, and inserted the whole
thing into E. coli cells. With the diatom protein supplying a diet of
foreign nucleotides, the plasmid was copied and passed on to dividing E.
coli cells for nearly a week. When the supply of foreign nucleotides
ran out, the bacteria replaced the foreign bases with natural ones.
Malyshev
sees the ability to control the uptake of foreign DNA bases as a safety
measure that would prevent the survival of alien cells outside the lab,
should they escape. But other researchers, including Benner, are trying
to engineer cells that can make foreign bases from scratch, obviating
the need for a feedstock.
Romesberg’s group is working on getting foreign DNA to encode
proteins that contain amino acids other than the 20 that together make
up nearly all natural proteins. Amino acids are encoded by ‘codons’ of
three DNA letters apiece, so the addition of just two foreign DNA
‘letters’ would vastly expand a cell’s ability to encode new amino
acids. “If you read a book that was written with four letters, you’re
not going to be able to tell many interesting stories,” Romesberg says.
“If you’re given more letters, you can invent new words, you can find
new ways to use those words and you can probably tell more interesting
stories.”
Potential uses of the technology include the incorporation of a toxic
amino acid into a protein to ensure that it kills only cancer cells,
and the development of glowing amino acids that could help scientists to
track biological reactions under the microscope. Romesberg’s team has
founded a company called Synthorx in San Diego, California, to
commercialize the work.
Ross Thyer, a synthetic biologist at the University of Texas at
Austin who co-authored a related News and Views article, says that the
work is “a big leap forward in what we can do”. It should be possible to
get the foreign DNA to encode new amino acids, he says.
“Many in the broader community thought that Floyd’s result would be
impossible,” says Benner, because chemical reactions involving DNA, such
as replication, need to be exquisitely sensitive to avoid mutation.
The alien E. coli contains just a single pair of foreign DNA bases
out of millions. But Benner sees no reason why a fully alien cell isn’t
possible. “I don’t think there’s any limit,” he says. “If you go back
and rerun evolution for four billion years, you could come up with a
different genetic system.”
But creating a wholly synthetic organism would be a huge challenge.
“A lot of times people will say you’ll make an organism completely out
of your unnatural DNA,” says Romesberg. “That’s just not going to
happen, because there are too many things that recognize DNA. It’s too
integrated into every facet of a cell’s life.”
No comments:
Post a Comment